Integrated Children's System
Review Record
There
are three review records:
- for children and young people who have received
a core assessment and have a Child’s
Plan;
- for children and young people whose names have
been placed on a child protection register and
have a Child Protection Plan;
- for children and young people who are looked
after and have a Care Plan and
for young people who are looked after and have
a Pathway Plan.
|
These records follow the same format but differ where
they take account of specific requirements in relevant
regulations and guidance.
The Review Record supports the following
processes:
- monitoring the child or young person’s
developmental progress over time and identification
of where needs are being met, partially met or
are unmet;
- updating key information on the child or young
person’s progress ;
- consideration of the impact of services on a
child or young person and identification where
planned services have not been provided;
- consideration of whether the Care Plan and placement
continue to meet the needs of a looked after child;
- identify and recommend any changes to the plan
for the child or young person.
|
View
Integrated Children's System Review Record for Children
in Need (PDF format)
View
Integrated Children's System Review Record for Child Protection
(PDF format)
View
Integrated Children's System Review Record for Looked
After Children (PDF format)
Completing a Review Record
The Review Record is in two parts:
- Part One is a review of the impact of actions
and services provided to a child or young person
and family, and records key changes. It is completed
by the social worker with responsibility for the
child or young person’s case;
- Part Two is an evaluation of the plan that is
in place for the child or young person. It is
completed by the review chair who evaluates the
extent to which the plan is meeting the needs
of the child or young person and identifies any
changes that are required in the light of information
presented at the Review.
|
Key Features: Part One
The structure of each developmental dimension is the same:
Child/young person’s identified
developmental needs & strengths |
How will these needs be responded
to: actions undertaken &/or services to
be provided |
Frequency & length of service:
e.g. hours per week |
Person/agency responsible |
Date services to commence/
commenced
|
Planned outcome: progress
to be achieved by next review or other specified date |
Isobel suffers from nocturnal enuresis |
Continued attendance at enuresis clinic |
Once a month |
Mrs White |
11.05.2002 |
Reduction in level of episodes. |
Isobel has a frozen shoulder following a fall |
GP to be approached for referral to physiotherapist |
|
Mrs Stein
(foster carer)
|
08.04.2002 |
Isobel’s shoulder will be better |
Isobel is experiencing anxiety attacks at school |
Referral to CAMHS |
|
Jim Smith
(social worker)
|
08.04.2002 |
Isobel and school will report that she is less anxious |
At Isobel’s three monthly review the following progress
was recorded:
(not full table)
Actions and services provided: both planned and
unplanned services and actions |
Frequency & length of service: e.g. hours per
week |
Person/agency responsible |
Date services
commenced
|
Planned outcome: progress to be achieved by next
review or other specified date |
Date services ended |
Actual Outcome: progress made, reason services ended
or not provided |
Continued attendance at enuresis clinic |
Once a month |
Mrs White |
11.05.2002 |
Reduction in level of episodes |
15.8.2002 |
There have been no episodes
since 10.4.2002 |
Mr and Mrs Stein started programme with Isobel |
nightly |
Mr and Mrs Stein |
08.04.2002 |
See above |
|
See above |
Isobel was seen by physiotherapist |
fortnightly |
Mr Eascote
physiotherapist |
18.04.2002 |
Isobel’s shoulder will be better |
30.5.2002 |
Isobel’s shoulder is
now better. |
Referral to CAMHS made
08.04.2002 – no service response.
|
|
Jim Smith
(social worker)
|
08.04.2002 |
Isobel and school will report that she is less anxious |
|
Isobel remains anxious about
school but her teachers report an improvement. |
- Outcomes
This is intended to record the practitioners overall assessment
of progress, the factors that have most influenced this
and the child young person’s needs in the dimension.
In the example above, although Isobel continued to attend
the enuresis clinic the practitioner may feel that the key
factor in achieving the change was the fact that foster
carers woke Isobel for the toilet during the night.
- Review of Care Plan for Looked After Child/Young person
Identifies whether the current Care Plan
remains appropriate to the child or young person’s
needs. Practitioners should explain any proposed change(s)
and identify the new plan.
- Review of Placement Arrangements and Agreements for Looked
After Child/Young person
This section also considers the key issues relating to the
placement and the practitioner’s views on its suitability
for the child/young person. Any proposed change of placement
should be identified.
- Review of Contact Arrangements for Looked after Child/Young
person
All members of the child or young person’s immediate
birth family should be recorded in this section, including
step and half siblings, even where no contact has taken
place. This will ensure that the review considers contact
arrangements for all members of the child or young person’s
immediate birth family.
The review of contact arrangements asks practitioners to
identify with whom the child/young person has had contact
since the last review. It does not ask for the frequency
of contact. It is expected that this will be covered in
the discussion. This section does, however, ask practitioners
to record whether there are any issues in relation to contact.
Key Features: Part Two
There is no set agenda for the review. The review, although
not necessarily the actual review meeting, should consider
the following areas:
- Each of the child/young person’s developmental
needs, the progress the child/young person is making,
the impact of services being provided and any outstanding
needs the child/young person might have.
- The parenting inputs the child/young person is receiving.
This will include the actions of birth family, carers
and the local authority as the child’s corporate
parent.
- Family and Environmental Factors. This includes
the caring environment being provided to the child/young
person and the influence of birth family and carers
parenting.
- Contact Arrangements, how these are working and
how they support the Care Plan for the child/young
person.
- Whether the existing Care Plan continues to meet
the child/young person’s needs.
|
- Whether the placement is meeting the child/young person’s
needs.
It is expected that the review chair will decide how each
area will be covered in the review. For example, if a child/young
person has complex educational needs the review chair may
decide that it is better to have separate meeting to consider
educational issues in more depth. The chair would use information
from this meeting to inform their review of the child/young
person’s progress and Care Plan.
- The Review Process
This records how the review was conducted and how the child
or young person was involved in the process. For some children
and young people looked after it may be in their best interests
to hold their review as a series of meetings because of
the complexity of the issues involved or because of tensions
between key participants.
It is expected that children and young people will be at
the heart of the reviewing process and actively consulted
about arrangements for the meeting and supported to contribute,
in accordance with their age and ability.
- Summary of Review Discussion
This is the chair’s notes of the meeting and will
form part of the record of the meeting to distribute to
participants.
- Decision of Review Child Protection Conference
This should be completed where the review is a child protection
conference review.
- Recommended Future Actions
Having gathered all the information available, the chair
of the review in consultation with other participants is
asked to consider whether changes should be made to the
plan for the child/young person.
As some recommendations may have resource implications it
will be the responsibility of each Council with Social Services
Responsibility to decide how the recommendations of the
review will be ratified within their organisation.
- Care Plan
On the basis of the information available to the review
the chair must decide, in the case of looked after children,
whether any changes are required to the overall aim of the
Care Plan to meet the child’s needs.
- Contact Arrangements
The chair should also decide whether there should be any
change in contact arrangements.
The final page identifies any other plans and agreements
that may need to be up dated as a result of the review. It
also records the date and time of the next review and the
signatures of those involved.
|